A buddy/mentor project should be implemented for new students and provide faculty support for students balancing studies with high-level sports, music, or public service.
We want to establish a textbook-loan fund and organize a bi-annual second-hand book fair to reduce the financial burden on students.
We want readable summaries of Faculty Board meetings, there should be a clear decision-making calendar, and survey-based course evaluations should be replaced with qualitative feedback sessions.
We want comprehensive roadmaps showing direct Master’s qualifications and pre-master requirements, improving guidance for post-graduation opportunities.
We oppose generic faculty courses, maintain small tutorial group sizes (max 25 in BA Year 1), and safeguard a wide range of electives to ensure disciplinary depth and personalized degrees.opportunities.
We advocate for the continuation of the English Psychology track to maintain a diverse student body and uphold the faculty’s international standing.
BSS students should have priority access to study spaces within their faculty, especially during peak exam periods.
We oppose the elimination of elective courses and support the preservation of the thesis as a vital component of social science education.
We want immediate and universal availability of lecture recordings to support all students, particularly those with disabilities or other valid reasons for absence.
We advocate for freely accessible quiet rooms for sensory recovery, prayer, and other needs, removing bureaucratic hurdles like advance booking.
We push for more working groups and interactive sessions to provide students with better opportunities to practice and apply course material.
We want to encourage the inclusion of diverse sources and student feedback in course materials, especially in international law, to foster critical thinking.
We advocate for more lenient entry requirements for Dutch Master’s programmes to attract a wider range of students and improve competitiveness.
We support a broader choice of courses and better information to students about existing opportunities, such as tailor-made tracks.
Maintain and promote accessible confidential advisors within the faculty as a model for student support and well-being.
We demand clear, timely information on how Bachelor profiles affect Master’s progression and we advocate for more flexible Master’s admission policies.
We oppose the removal of first-year tutorials and fight to preserve current contact hours to maintain educational quality.
We want tutorials led by qualified university instructors and we oppose the complete closure of the Zernike Library, retaining the book delivery service.
We call for regular newsletters, open information meetings, and clear information on decision-making processes and contact persons.
Students with valid reasons should be able to access lectures online and all official faculty communication should be available in both Dutch and English.
Increase student representation in decision-making, improve transparency of faculty council activities through newsletters and open meetings.
We actively oppose budget cuts that diminish education quality, such as reductions in TA pay and numbers.
We campaign for and wish to educate staff on the importance and ease of providing lecture recordings for all students.
We advocate for sufficient charging outlets and ensure the Feringa building is accessible for students with mobility challenges, including functional door access.
Visible signage for gender-neutral bathrooms should be ensured and we advocate for the introducion of faculty-specific confidential advisors for better social safety.
We oppose mergers and fight to preserve the unique identity, autonomy, and international profile of the Faculty of Spatial Sciences.
We advocate against the reduction of English-language courses to maintain diversity and international career opportunities.
We push for a dedicated faculty building or location to end the “nomadic” study experience and ensure access to modern study spaces.
Improve faculty websites and promotional materials to provide clearer distinctions between HGP and SPD programmes for prospective and current students.
We want the selection process for programme committees to be transparent, accessible, and managed by the faculty, potentially through elections.
De Groninger Studentenbond © 2025